Summary 

In scientific work, economic science, policy and practice in the service of a "purely" economic goal – the author regards as an economic fascism, as a crime againsthumanity(?!).

The domination of money, the market, the profit of capital in society and in the state, according to the author's assertion, is the domination of the marked economic categories over man, domination over the people, which is economic fascism, and that is the manifestation of the essential nature of true capitalism.

Moreover, the author reasonably argues that the deep "scientific" roots associated with economic fascism should be sought in the views of Adam Smith, one of the founders of classical political economy, and, in particular, in his "main idea", called by Adam Smith himself, " invisible hand "(?!).

The author expresses a categorical disagreement with the understanding and interpretation of the so-called "invisible hand" of Adam Smith, according to which, as if obtaining maximum profit automatically solves the problems of realizing the interests of the people.

In scientific work, the author notes that the market certainly has its own laws and laws that must be taken into account in the process of managing economic processes, in the process of governing society and the state.

However, from the point of view of the need to implement the supremacy of the interests of the people, which the state power should serve, the author considers it absolutely impermissible to obey the market, because if we are guided by the so-called "invisible hand" of the market, and if we follow the idea of ​​Adam Smith's self-organization of the market, “blind” and “stupid” state –  in effect we get a fictitious state, antisocial state serving a "purely” economic goal – serving the domination of money, the market, capital gains on man and promoting robbery and enslavement of the people, i.e., we get – economic fascism, which is the worst manifestation of the essential nature of true capitalism.

According to the author's substantiated statement, it is of fundamental importance that the state power governs proceeding from the interests of the people and in the interests of the people, so that the state power is not subordinate to the market and market self-government, which inevitably means the domination of the "invisible hand" of the market, means the dominance of money, market, profit capital over man, means the existence of economic fascism in society and in the state.

Therefore, in spite of Adam Smith's universality in the whole world, and despite his unconditional merits in economics, Adam Smith, in the author's assertion, by his main "scientific" idea of the so-called "invisible hand" is actually one of the founders and "scientific" "interpreter" of economic fascism.

Thus, classical political economy, which at one time was a great achievement of economic scientific thought, and in the creation of which Adam Smith has one of the most important places, was the political economy of the protection of capitalism, was the political economy of protecting economic fascism.

Referring again to the problem of serving a "purely" economic goal – the problems of serving money, the market, profits, capital, the author notes that this is absolutely unacceptable and criminal, for the robbery and enslavement of a huge number of people takes place in those states in which “ purely" economic thinking is dominating .

As an example of the manifestation of "purely" economic thinking – manifestations of economic fascism, the author cites the assumption and functioning in society and in the state of gambling "games" – the so-called "gambling" (obviously criminal) business – for the sake of getting money, for the sake of achieving a "purely" economic goal – through fraudulent robbery and the destruction of a huge number of people.

It is as a result of all of the above that the author claims that economic science, policy and practice in the service of a "purely" economic goal are economic fascism and a crime against humanity.

Moreover, according to the author's substantiated statement, the solution of the mentioned problem is possible only on the basis of fundamentally new scientific directions created by him and fundamentally new scientific Theories – on the basis of the Philosophy of the Social Purpose, the Theory of the Supremacy of Interests of the People and The Theory of Balancing the Rights and Responsibility of Officials.